Modi Traumatized for drawing Hindu Swastika in America

Your blog URL:http://blogs.siliconindia.com/davemakkar/ SILICON INDIA BLOCKED THIS ARTICLE ON 9-05-13 TO SAVE THOSE BEING EXPOSED FOR MATERIAL BENEFITS?

Modi Traumatized for drawing Hindu Swastika by Teachers in America

Thursday 05th, September 2013

views (63607)

Swastika Drawn by 8 yrs old & Hindu Bridegroom & Bride with Swastika

www.proswastika.org  WATCH THE PRO SWASTIKA VIDEO

Letter of Support by International Raelian Movement (www.rael.org)

70,000 strong Members (http://www.proswastika.org/news.php)

Hindu Swastika: Sacred Faith & Auspiciousness 

Nazi Logo is Hate Symbol

SCHOOL OFFICIALS SHOULD BE ASHAMED FOR DEFENDING COUNSELING OF THE 8 YRS OLD FOR DRAWING HINDU SWASTIKA JAN. 7, 2013

Dear Dr. Brennon (Superintendent of School):

We are shocked to see one sided/misrepresentation rather complete lies attributed to you in various news papers in reference to Dec.4^TH, 2012 Swastika drawing by an 8 yrs old along with Christmas Tree as part of Holiday drawing assignment. You are blatantly claiming that teacher aid has apologized to the student that is a complete lie. The teacher aid verbally did apologized to the mother only but not in writing that is required by looking at the gravity of the situation and the offense she has committed of traumatizing an 8 yrs old for her own ignorance. She has hurt the religious feelings of not only the 8 yrs old but the entire Hindu community of America. 

Dr. Bernnan you should be ashamed of yourself for defending the Counseling of the 8yrs old for drawing Hindu Swastika. In fact you are defending all the three educators; the teacher aid, counselor as well as the principle. We fully support Raelian Guide Thomas Kaenzig that “it’s not the child who needs counseling but the teacher aide who complained about the child’s drawing, the counselor and the principle who approved counseling.” All three must be counseled on Hinduism as well as on Swastika.

It is very strange how come these Educators catering to the multi-religious society; Principle, Counselor and Teacher Aid are so ignorant about Hindu symbols? The fact is the township they are catering to has more than 8% Hindu population. It was their basic responsibility as educators to know that the Swastika symbol 3^RD Grader drew, originated in 2000BC and is not the symbol Swastika the rotated distortion of Hindu Swastika, must be called "NAZI LOGO" the Nazis has used. The one used by Nazi’s is markedly different and the differences are clearly visible to human eyes.

Hindu Swastika is always drawn with red vermillion and can be drawn on any surface including human body, on the head after complete head shave off of a child as per Hindu rituals. It is a symbol of faith and auspiciousness and used for all religious ceremonies including Hindu weddings.

On the other hand Nazi Logo is drawn with black in a white circle within a red square and it is a symbol of hate.

These Educators before traumatizing the 8 yrs old should have spoken to a Hindu Priest or the parent of the child concerning the matter for which they themselves are completely ignorant. These educators have hurt the religious feelings of the child and also the Religious Feelings of the entire Hindu community living in New Jersey and other parts of America.

On top of that these ignorant Educators lost an opportunity to present the child’s drawing as a show case on “Unity in Diversity”. The child has drawn Hindu Swastika & Christmas Tree that represent Christianity, together on one sheet. Educators could have shared this with the child’s classmates rather with every student of the school by explaining them the meaning of both symbols.

Since Middlesex County is home to a large Hindu population; on behalf of the community we demand that all Educators in Middlesex County Schools must be educated about Hindu Religious Symbols keeping in mind that Hinduism is practiced by almost 1 Billion people around the world.

Respectfully submitted

On behalf of Hindu Community of New Jersey by Devendra Makkar

CC: New Jersey Governor Chris Christie

Attorney General Jeffery S. Chiesa ;

NJ Commissioner Education Christopher Cerf

Middlesex County Superintendent Stewart, Samuel

Board President Eugene Donofrio<eugene.donofrio@obps.org>

ACLU-NJ Legal Intake;Thomas Kaenzig <thomas@rael.org>

8 yrs old Traumatized for drawing Hindu Swastika by Teachers in America

A bizarre incident took place at an Elementary School in Middlesex County of New Jersey (USA) on Dec. 4, 2012 . As part of 3^RD Grade School work children were asked to draw a symbol of a holiday they celebrate. Innocently an 8 yrs old drew a Hindu Swastika along with a Christmas Tree. When the class teacher saw the drawing she knew it what significance it has for Hindus. But an ignorant Teacher Aid took strong offense to it. According to the people familiar with the incident; despite few other staff members telling the Teacher Aid that it is not Nazi Swastika she was not prepared to listen to any one. She kept on saying she has been offended and her religious feelings have been hurt. It is hate towards her and her community.

The Teacher Aid insisted that the 8 yrs old must get counseling right away and she was backed by the Principle. Without the knowledge and permission of the parents the child was counseled by the Counselor under racial bias. The poor parent in the evening could not figure out why their 8 yrs old was looking visibly frightened and traumatized. On being questioned the child stated crying and throwing up. In bits and pieces they were able to get some story from the child. Further, the child, in a traumatized voice asked them what the child had done wrong. The parents were also lost why their 8 yrs old has been traumatized and harassed physically, emotionally and mentally in the name of Counseling for no reason that too without their knowledge and permission?

Next day the couple met the Principle who told them that their child was doing a school project where a "staff member" got very upset for what was drawn on paper. The child got upset and was counseled but it was not on the directive of that “staff member.” The child must understand that “when you are out with other people they may see things differently”. What the child has drawn “Every where else it is used as a hate symbol”. The parents tried to explain that it is a universal fact Swastika is just as sacred for Hindus as a cross for Christians or a Star of David for Jews. Then the Principle stated that if any child had drawn other religious symbols such as the Star of David or Cross of Jesus, then they would have been counseled the same way! Parent protested still they should have been asked for permission first. Principle said that they are fully entitled to counsel any student for any reason without the permission of their parent.

The parent told the Principle that only person that needed counseling is the staff member who they know was upset for no apparent reason because of ignorance and not prepared to understand the importance of Swastik for Hindus. On Dec. 9^th parent filed a Complaint with the School Board and County School Superintendent against the Principle, Counselor and the Teacher Aid; demanding proper investigation into the conduct of all 3 and Teacher Aid must give written apology and must seek counseling from a Hindu Priest or a Scholar. In case she refuses to give written apology she must be dismissed.

Dec. 28, 2012 Dear Mr. Stewart, (Middlesex County Superintendent)

I'm writing you on behalf of the 70,000 members of the International Raelian Movement (http://www.rael.org/) regarding an incident that took place earlier this month at one of your schools where an 8 year old student was forced to undergo counseling for drawing a swastika for a school project.

The swastika is part of the official Raelian symbol that was given to us by our dear creators the Elohim and represents infinity in time. There cannot be a more "sacred" symbol for us Raelians and this is also the case for the billions of Hindus, Buddhists, Jains and members of other religions on this planet. To reprimand a Hindu child for drawing a swastika is highly offensive to all of us and totally unacceptable. It is not the 8 year old who needs counseling but the teacher aid who complained about the symbol, the counselor as well as the principal who approved the counseling. They need to be informed about the beautiful origin of this symbol that can be found throughout the world, on every continent, since the beginnings of humanity and where it has been a  symbol of peace, harmony and good luck for thousands of years. We have actually put together a very informative website on the swastika symbol and I really hope that you will pass on this link to your staff:  http://www.proswastika.org

As you can see on our website the swastika is widely used even throughout Israel:

http://www.proswastika.org/page.php?4.2  and following pages.

Synagogues in various countries are decorated with swastikas like this Jewish synagogue in Verona (Italy): http://www.proswastika.org/page.php?6.64

By associating the swastika with the Nazis, we only give credit to the monstrosities of this horrible regime. Symbols have been abused throughout history and hence the importance of explaining people their true origin. Imagine the outcry amongst Christians worldwide if an African American teacher aid would take offense in a Christian child's drawing of a cross for a Christmas school project because the teacher aid's ancestors were killed by the Ku Klux Klan.

And I highly doubt that any of your principals would approve racial bias counseling for a Jewish child drawing a star of David for a school Christmas project that would have offended a teacher aid from Palestine whose family was slaughtered by the Israeli army. If such counseling would be approved, all staff involved would probably be dismissed within a few days and you would have to resign too.  Such a double standard is unacceptable and we expect at the very least a sincere apology to all  those for who the swastika is a highly sacred symbol.

Sincerely,

Thomas Kaenzig (Raelian Guide)
SILICONINDIA BLOCKED THIS ARTICLE WITH 63,607 VIEWS ON 9-05-13 TO SAVE HINDU LEADERS & THEIR MASTERS FROM BEING EXPOSED MAY BE FOR MATERIAL BENEFITS. BY MUZZLING THE TRUTH SILICONINDIA HAS ALSO VIOLATED MY FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS. 

The South Asian Insider News New York USA

The Indian Panorama News New York USA

Anti-Bullying Law of New Jersey is Un-Constitutional & Anti-Minority

Your blog URL:http://blogs.siliconindia.com/davemakkar/ SILICONINDIA BLOCKED THIS ARTICLE ON 9-05-13 FOR MATERIAL BENEFITS?

ANTI-BULLYING LAW OF NJ IS ANTI-MINORITY & UN-CONSTITUTIONAL

Thursday 05th, September 2013

views (90270)

Dave Makkar

Cfo

New Jersey Anti-Bullying Law is Anti-Minority & Un-Constitutional. It can damage 8-14 yrs old emotionally, mentally & physically; especially from minority communities. 

Governor Christie the Anti-Minority Face of Republican Party & Assemblyman Chivukula the Anti-Minority Face of Democrat Party.

A PETITION WAS FILED BY ATTORNEY HINDS TO NEW JERSEY GOVERNOR, ASSEMBLY & SENATE ON FEB. 18, 2012 FOR PUBLIC DISCUSSION ON THIS LAW. ALL OF THEM ARE TAKING NO ACTION.

The ill-educated absentee Governor Chris Christie along with ill-educated Lawmakers in Senate and Assembly passed an Anti-Minority and Anti-JuvenileAnti-Bullying Law One Size Fits All in Jan. 2011 without reading it without caring for the emotional, mental and physical well being as well as self esteem of 8 to 14 years old. This law is applicable to 8yrs old to 28yrs old students of New Jersey. No public comments were ever asked for such a sensitive Law concerning 8-14 yrs old especially minority students from their parents, teachers, psychiatrist and social workers. It was implemented in Schools in Sep. 2011 and at majority of the Schools no prior training was ever given to the students about the Law and consequences of its violation. Some School administrators have yet to implement this Law because along with some other organizations they have strong reservations about this “One Size Fits All Anti-Bullying Law” designed by Law makers of New Jersey famous for not reading any Bill even if it will be adopted as Law concerning juveniles. 

On Dec. 15, 2011 it was brought to the notice of all the Lawmakers and Governor that there are serious flaws in the Law as far as 8-14 yr old are concerned. Despite numerous written requests and a representation by Attorney Lennox Hinds on behalf of a parent Mr. Mohan Gandhi on Feb. 18, 2012 to Governor, Senate and Assembly, the lawmakers have no time to reply to this important issue concerning the well being of NJ children. 

They are ignoring the fact that even the United States Supreme Court says that"children cannot be viewed simply as miniature adults" because a child's age is more than a chronological fact." Rather, it is a fact that "generates commonsense conclusions about behavior and perception.' "Children generally are less mature and responsible than adults." "They often lack the experience, perspective and judgment to recognize and avoid choices that could be detrimental to them."  

This law is denying due process rights of self or legal representation, to present material evidence or cross examine witnesses in violation of US constitution. Under this law 8-14 yr old can be interrogated in the absence of their parent or guardian and a biased Educator can even force them to admit in writing that they have done bullying that they may not have done. This forced admission is then used against that child even with no prior history of any wrong doing and with excellent academic record that he/she has done bulling for punishment as well as put on their School record permanently. They are not provided with the charging instrument and have no right to cross examine their accuser or witnesses or the educators who made the report. Now the child is branded as a bully on his School Record and among his/her piers. To Fight this gross injustice one needs $15,000.00 to $30,000.00 and more than one year to get the record straight. The ill-educated unionized Law makers of New Jersey; majority are attorneys have deliberately crafted this Bill to fill up the pockets of Attorneys and in some cases their own pockets if they are practicing attorneys in School Related Matters.

ATTORNEY LENNOX HINDS

The New Jersey Anti-Bullying Policy Is Subject to Constitutional Challenges On the Grounds of Overbroad & Vague Statutory Language

Federal constitutional law provides that a regulation is unconstitutionally vague, and thus a violation of due process, if it does not give fair notice of the regulation's reach and requires students to guess as to the contours of its proscriptions. Although a school has a certain degree of flexibility in its disciplinary procedures, its regulations may still be found to be unconstitutionally vague or overbroad. The most common reason for a court to sustain a vague or overbroad challenge of a school policy is when specific terms within the policy are not defined. Specificity of terms is especially important when the policy’s regulations are content-based regulation of speech.

A plain review of the New Jersey ’s anti-bullying law and anti-bullying policy shows that they are susceptible to overbroad and vagueness constitutional challenges. For example, the Policy’s prohibition against harassment, intimidation, and bullying applying to “any gesture, any written, verbal or physical act, or any electronic communication” “that has the effect of insulting or demeaning any pupil or group of pupils” can easily be construed as unconstitutionally vague and overbroad because it seeks to regulate public school students and officials speech and behavior without compass or guidance as to the parameters of the policy.

LIST OF LAWMAKERS ADMITTING THEY NEVER READ THE BILL BEFORE SIGNING IT & A LAWMAKER ON FACEBOOK

Senator Linda Greenstein: Mr. Gandhi talked to her for almost 20 minutes at a Indian event her husband was also there. I kept her asking point balnk “did she read the bill before signing it?” She kept on circumventing the question by saying attorneys review it and even Governor’s office his legal staff vetted the Bill. She was explained in details about the objections of Attorney Lennox Hinds. She said send me all the information I will look into it. That was sent next day and she has yet to reply despite repeated reminders.

"Kean T., Sen. D.O." To: Mohan Gandhi  

Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2012 4:36 PM

Subject: NJ Anti-Bullying Laws

Dear Mr. Gandhi:  Thank you for contacting our offices regarding the state’s Anti-Bullying Law. We can assure you that the legislation underwent a thorough legal and constitutional review as a piece of legislation and then underwent a second review by the Governor’s Counsel before the bill was signed into law. However, we will keep your comments under advisement. Again, thank you for sharing your concerns with us on a matter of personal importance. 

Sincerely,

Senator Thomas H. Kean

Assemblyman Jon M. Bramnick

Assemblywoman Nancy F. Muñoz

   

Senator Sam Thompson: Admitted that he never read the Bill at a Iftar Party (Aug. 16) His reason is attorneys draft it.

Assemblyman Chivukula: “I never read it and no one reads the Bills unless that person is seriously involved with the Bill. (August 26 in a Indian gathering at Warren)

FACEBOOK CONVERSATION WITH ASSEMBLYMAN CHIUSANO

FYI, I did not vote for or support this bill.Gary Chiusano 9-9-12

Reply by Gandhi 9-10-12

Give this statement to media to expose those who signed it without reading it. Republican Senator Sam Thompson & Democrat Assemblyman Upendra Chivukula has admitted that they never read the bill before signing it. Their excuse is it was written by attorneys and no one reads the bills!

Gary Chiusano 9-10-12

I read the bills. In the future, if you want to discuss any legislative items with me, please contact me through my legislative office. Do not use Facebook to contact me regarding legislative issues. Thank you.

Reply by Gandhi 9-10-12

Please be advised all the lawmakers including you were sent numerous e-mails on this issue. When my own Representatives Tom Kean, Bramnick & Munoz has failed to respond then I have no complaint against you. Assembly Speaker Sheila Oliver received written communication from me in Dec 2011 and Jan. 2012 from my Attorney Hinds should have shared that information with her Assembly colleagues including you. It is almost a year she has not replied to me or my attorney. The worst is Big Fat Fraud Governor Christie he received every thing by mail, by hand on Dec.21, 2011 at Spotswood and again by mail in Jan 2012 from my attorney Lennox Hinds; has yet to respond. 

I have been forced to raise this issue on Social Media with NJ Lawmakers because of their apathy and probably lack of concern for the minorities; especially children in the age group of 8-14yrs old. I am trying to digest how could these lawmakers can disrespect US Supreme Court with impunity in broad day light?  How could these lawmakers can make a law “ONE SIZE FITS ALL” for 8yrs old to 28yrs old Student? They are ignoring the fact that even the United States Supreme Court says that "children cannot be viewed simply as miniature adults" because a child's age is more than a chronological fact." Rather, it is a fact that "generates commonsense conclusions about behavior and perception.' "Children generally are less mature and responsible than adults." "They often lack the experience, perspective and judgment to recognize and avoid choices that could be detrimental to them."

Harassment, Intimidation, Bullying Definition from NJSA: 18A:37-14:

"Harassment, intimidation or bullying" means any gesture, any written, verbal or physical act, or any electronic communication, whether it be a single incident or a series of incidents, that is reasonably perceived as being motivated either by any actual or perceived characteristic, such as race, color, religion, ancestry, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity and expression, or a mental, physical or sensory disability, or by any other distinguishing characteristic, that takes place on school property, at any school-sponsored function, on a school bus, or off school grounds as provided for in section 16 of P.L.2010, c.122 (C.18A:37-15.3), that substantially disrupts or interferes with the orderly operation of the school or the rights of other students and that:

(A) a reasonable person should know, under the circumstances, will have the effect of physically or emotionally harming a student or damaging the student's property, or placing a student in reasonable fear of physical or emotional harm to his person or damage to his property;

(B) has the effect of insulting or demeaning any student or group of students; or

(C) creates a hostile educational environment for the student by interfering with a student's education or by severely or pervasively causing physical or emotional harm to the student. 

L.2002, c.83, s.2; amended 2007, c.129, s.1; 2010, c.122, s.11.

FOR MORE INFO ON HIB POLICY

http://www.springfieldschools.com/hib/fmg.html

  

A REPRESENTATION FOR CHANGES IN CURRENT ANTI-BULLYING/HIB POLICY WAS MADE ON DECEMBER 15, 2011 TO NJ SENATE, ASSEMBLY & GOVERNOR BY A PARENT. THAT WAS FOLLOWED BY THEIR ATTORNEY LENNOX HINDS LETTER TO THEM ON FEB. 18, 2012. TILL TO DATE THERE IS NO REPLY FROM THEM EXCEPT SENATE PRESIDENT SWEENEY’S STUPID REPLY OF JAN. 11, 2012 HE WILL NOT MAKE ANY CHANGES.

REPLY OF SENATE PRESIDENT SENATOR SWEENEY

REPRODUCTION FROM THE ACTUAL DOCUMENT

NEW JERSEYSENATE

STEPHENE M. SWEENEY

Senate President

Email:SenSweeney@njleg.org

January 11, 2012 

Mohan Gandhi

New Jersey

Dear Mr. Gandhi:

Thank you for contacting my office regarding your concerns on New Jersey ’s recently enacted, “Anti-Bullying Bill of Rights Act.” I appreciate the opportunity to respond to your concerns on this issue.

As you are aware, Assembly Bill 3466 was passed by both the houses of the New Jersey Legislatures, and signed into law by Governor Chris Christie on January 5, 2011 . This law, which I supported, implements a number of recommendations made by the New Jersey Commission on Bullying in Schools, which was created to examine New Jersey ’s approach to the issue of bullying. Please rest assured that I believe that any accusations of discrimination must be taken seriously, and it is possible that changes may need to be made to this law in the future, but I also believe that we must allow for time to fully implement this law before making decisions that could impact the wellbeing of our state’s children.

Once again, thank you for contacting my office to express your opinion on this matter.

Sincerely,

Signed

Stephen M.. Sweeney

Senate President

Third Legislative District

SILICONINDIA BLOCKED THIS ARTICLE WITH 90,270 VIEWS ON 9-05-13 TO SAVE HINDU LEADERS & THEIR MASTERS FROM BEING EXPOSED MAY BE FOR MATERIAL BENEFITS. BY MUZZLING THE TRUTH SILICONINDIA HAS ALSO VIOLATED MY FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS.

US Media Terrorized 12yrs old Hindu for Demanding Equal Rights with Jews & Christians of his Town & Changes in Anti-Bullying Laws  86,288 views

“The New Jerseymedia especially the Jewish media was reprehensible. They were disappointing. It is reprehensible that those kinds of personal and crude attacks could be leveled at someone like this young 12 year old Middle school student who was simply expressing his opinion on a matter of public policy and doing it with a great deal of poise.”

“He was respectful, sincere, and spoke with conviction with Governor Christie. He provided a model of civil discourse,” “And yet, some of those who disagreed with his position – especially the Jewish Media and commentators throughout the blogosphere – responded with behavior that can only be described as misogynistic, vitriolic, and a misrepresentation of the position of this student on the issue of racial equality and changes in the existing Anti-Bullying Laws.”

READ THE FULL STORY ON SILICON AMERICA

http://americafraud.blogspot.com/2013/09/GandhiTerrorizedforDemandingEqualityInUSA.html

12yr old Sumit Gandhi in a public meeting to New Jersey Governor Chris Christie please ensure "I have Equal Rights with Jews & Christians of my Town and bring age appropriate Changes in Anti-Bullying laws" in a Public Meeting in Spotswood NJ.

Ban Weapons of Mass Destruction:NRA can not Dictate 307 Mil Americans

Your blog URL:http://blogs.siliconindia.com/davemakkar/ SILICONINDIA BLOCKED THIS ARTICLE ON 9-05-13 FOR MATERIAL BENEFITS?

NRA can not Dictate 307 Mil Americans: Ban all Weapons of Mass Destruction

Thursday 05th, September 2013

views (65116)

Dave Makkar

Cfo

(AP Photo/Alex Brandon)

4 MIL NRA MEMBERS CAN NOT DICTATE 307 MIL AMERICANS

BAN ALL AR-15 TYPE WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION

In all the recent mass massacre since 2005 including gunning down 20 children & 6 adults in Newtown; the choice of weapon has been AR-15 Type rapid fire weapon. These weapons of mass destructions can fire 4-6 Bullets per Second and around 100 in One Minute.

In 1994 President Clinton banned Assault weapons. In 2000 after the 1999 Columbine High School massacre federal and state passed the laws to ban high-capacity magazines and strict background checks at gun shows. The law made it a crime to buy guns for criminals and minors.

"In April 1999 during the Columbine High School massacre; 12 students & 1 teacher was shot dead and 21 students were injured. The Gunmen; 2 senior students, Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold both were eqipped with semi-autometic weapons with high capacity magazines and later both of them committed suicide with their own guns.

In 2004 President Bush the domestic pet of war industry lifted the ban on Assault weapons. Since then 6 mass murder incident has happened; First, in March 2005 when 6 students, 2 School officials were shot dead at Red Lake High School in Minnesota and before that the 16yrs old gunman Jeff Weise shot dead his grand father and his girl friend. Second, in April 2007 at Virginia Tech 32 dead and 17 wounded making it the deadliest shooting incident by a single gunman in U.S. history. Third, in Jan. 2011 Congresswoman Gabby Giffards was critically injured by a gunshot wound to the head; thirteen people were injured and six others were killed in the shooting, among them federal judge John Roll by a lone gunman Jared Loughner. Fourth, Aurora Theater shooting in July 2012 in that 12 dead and 58 injured (11 critically). Fifth, on August 5, 2012 at a Sikh Temple in Wisconsin 6 dead, first ever gun massacre in any Sikh Temple in US history. Now Sixth and the latest on Dec. 7, 2012 in Newtown 20 kids age 6-7 dead and 6 adult dead due to the use of weapon of mass destruction.

When we are going to wake up? How many more incidents of massacre by Guns, we wants to see? British banned assault weapons right after the deadly shooting of 16 kindergarten-age children and their teachers in March 1996 by Thomas Hamilton. Australian's banned assault weapons in 1996 with in 12 days of the shooting spree in the southern state of Tasmania that killed 35 people. In all the 6 mass murders in America the Killers used a similar AR-15 type rapid firing weapon. We have done nothing since 2005.

We can learn from 1958 Gun Law of Japan. The only guns that Japanese citizens can legally buy and use are shotguns and air rifles, and it's not easy to do. Even Israel where citizens are prone to Terrorist attacks it is very difficult to get a gun. After 60 days training and mental health evaluation one gets 50 Bullets as life time supply.

What is wrong with us the Americans; that even after 6 mass killings since 2005, we are still having a debate whether to ban the weapons of mass destructions or not? How come 4 million National Rifle Association (NRA) members have more rights than 307 million Americans? Our politicians are hiding behind their cowardice or may be want to protect their financial supporters the NRA/gun industry rather than ensuring the well being and security of Americans.

After AIPAC & its numerous Pro Israel affiliates; NRA is one of the richest and most powerful lobby in Washington. They contribute heavily to political candidates to enlist their support against any kind of ban on assault weapons. NRA is also responsible in taming the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) that enforces gun laws. NRA oppose the access of ATF to a database to trace weapons and national gun registry. The ATF agents have no statutory authority; even the number of times they can visit a dealer is restricted. The ATF’ budget has been flat for years and has been without a permanent administrator since Bush presidency because of the NRA’s opposition.

Those who are hiding behind 2^ND Amendment should be ashamed of themselves; it is not American rather it is unpatriotic to support weapons of mass destruction. We must look at the death rate by Guns in UK that is 35 per year to our almost 12,000 gun related deaths per year.

Ban on rapid fire assault weapons has nothing to do with 2^ND Amendment or guns for sports and hunting. Even the 2^ND Amendment is being misinterpreted the world “State Militia” means “State Police” not the Lanza or Page or Holmes or Loughner or Cho or Wiese. The Gun Lobby is free to keep their Air Rifles & Shot Guns minus the high capacity magazines.

NRA's reaction more guns against guns on the recent brutal killing of 20 children age 6-7 is most inhuman, lacks empathy. Their suggestion that each school in America should have Armed Gaurds is most insane suggestion. There are more than 135,000 schools in USA; the security tag for it could be well over $25 Billion per annum. How and who will pay for it, there is no word from NRA on this issue.

We have became a Banana Republic with over 300 milion weapons for 311 million Americans. This is despite the fact United States has more Police Officers than anywhere else in the world. More than 32% US household have multiple guns including AR-15 type weapons of mass destruction. There are amost 140,000 GUN DEALERS as compared to 14,000 McDonalds & 56,000 Grocery stores in entire America. We must understand that the lives of our children and citizens is more sacred than Guns. We must ban all kind of weapons of mass destructions and high capacity magazines.

Dave Makkar

The world is a dangerous place not because of people who do evil, but because of good people who look on and do nothing about it. -Albert Einstein

SILICONINDIA BLOCKED THIS ARTICLE WITH 65,116 VIEWS ON 9-05-13 TO SAVE HINDU LEADERS & THEIR ZIONIST MASTERS FROM BEING EXPOSED MAY BE FOR MATERIAL BENEFITS. BY MUZZLING THE TRUTH SILICONINDIA HAS ALSO VIOLATED MY FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS. (By the way NaMo Supporters have nothing to do with this Article!)

The Indian Panorama News New York USA